- Ray.
------------------------
January 27, 2017
Dear Mayor Stoney, members of City Council,
I am writing to you today representing the Sierra Club
Falls of the James, one of the largest and
oldest environmental organizations in the area. We are a
local grassroots group that is part of the
national Sierra Club. We are writing because we are very
concerned about the removal of trees
and the state of historic Monroe Park. We note that we
previously produced a statement on this
topic in May of 2014 (ITEM 1), and we are profoundly
disappointed that our concerns have been
ignored. We also note previous public outcry about trees
removed at the Redskins Camp,
Tredegar Green, and the Maggie Walker statue site. In
regard to Monroe Park, we would like to
present you with the following statement of facts and
remedial suggestions. Ideally, we would like
to meet with you in person at a future date to discuss
further.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
From 2004 until 2012, the Monroe Park Advisory Council
(MPAC) was created by Richmond
City Council to craft a master plan for the renovation of
Monroe Park, a designated urban green
space purchased by the city in 1851 and historically
known for its comprehensive tree canopy
consisting of many mature, healthy and diverse tree
specimens. This urban tree canopy provided
great benefit to the urban Richmond community through
scenic vistas, cooling shade, storm water
displacement and the filtering of pollutants caused by
the dense downtown street grid. In 2008, a
publicly vetted master plan was created and approved by
the Richmond Urban Design Committee
(UDC) without comment. This plan emphasized restoration
and conservation of the majority of the
existing tree canopy with emphasis placed on species
planted during the parks major period of
significance, circa 1900-1910. The original 2008 master
plan is available for download on the
Richmond city government website with a graphic depiction
of a comprehensive and fully restored
tree canopy (ITEM 1).
2009 WORK DOCUMENTS APPROVAL
In order to implement the approved master plan, work
documents had to be crafted. In a
move that was never presented to neighborhood
associations or the public at large, the work
documents contained a modification to the tree plan that
reduced the number of trees in the park
by +/- 26 trees. Members of the Monroe Park Advisory
Council were not advised of the significant
tree canopy reduction as designed by 3 North and
supervised by MPAC president Alice Massie.
In 2009, the UDC and the Richmond Planning Commission
approved work documents.
VCU ADVOCACY OF TREE REMOVAL IN THE PARK
In 1991, VCU brought before city council a request to
remove 37 trees from Monroe Park
(ITEM 2). Due to public outcry and opposition, city
council voted down the measure. Again, in
2006 during master plan deliberations, VCU again made the
suggestion that a substantial portion
of the tree canopy be removed. Ms. Massie was in
agreement. City planning director Rachel
Flynn in response assisted by hiring consultants and the
plan (ITEM 1) was chosen due to public
consensus over the copious removal of healthy mature
trees.
MONROE PARK CONSERVANCY AND LEASE
In 2011, the Monroe Park Conservancy (MPC), established
by Alice Massie and others as a
501c3 corporation, sought to lease Monroe Park to solicit
a 3 million dollar amount toward the 6
million dollar park renovation and to exert management
preferences on the park thereafter. On
April 14, 2014, city council approved Ord. 2014-010-50, a
30-year lease with the MPC with said
lease commencing after completion of the renovation. On
the same day, city council approved
Res. 2014-R064-64 which sought to diversify board
membership of the MPC to include
neighboring community stakeholders to be achieved within
a 6-month period. Ms. Massie signed
the resolution in agreement on behalf of the MPC. Now, as
of 2 1/2 years after the lease
approval, Ms. Massie has refused to diversify the MPC
Board as per signed resolution. A month
and a half after lease approval, on May 27, 2014, city
council abolished the MPAC through Ord.
2014-111-84. This further excluded any participation by
the public on important matters pertaining
to the park.
FURTHER CONTROVERSIAL PROPOSED PARK PLAN MODIFICATIONS
In December of 2016, during the holiday season and during
a time when Richmond City
government was in transition due to election of a new
Mayor and a new 2nd District
Councilperson (Monroe Park lies in the 2nd District), a
controversial proposal was submitted to
the UDC for an expedited hearing on January 5, 2017
(ITEMS 3 and 4). Both newly elected
Mayor Levar Stoney and 2nd District Councilperson Kim
Gray would be eligible to sit on the MPC
Board of Directors as of January 1, 2017 but presumably
would not have time to completely vet
the proposal before the hearing on the 5th. The sponsors
of this questionable proposal were city
Capital Projects Manager Donald Summers and 3 North
Project Manager Andrea Almond, also a
sitting member of the UDC. It is troubling that UDC
policy dictates that proposals that have
significant impact such as this one be presented to both
affected city council members and
neighborhood associations. No presentations were planned
to either city councilors or
neighborhood associations. After complaints on this were
made to UDC secretary Ms. Onufer,
Mr. Summers temporarily withdrew the hearing proposal for
January 5, 2017.
DECEMBER 12, 2016 MEETING AND TREE REMOVAL
On December 12,2016, around the time of the UDC proposal
application, a meeting was held
in Monroe Park which included Ms. Massie, 3 North Design
Team, City Capital Projects Manager
Mr. Donald Summers, city arborist Alexander Elton and
people from the city annual tree
contractor service. At this meeting, an additional 14
trees were specified for removal. 7 were
declared dead by the city arborist Alexander Elton and 7
were declared in conflict with a proposed
city bio-retention feature in the park, with statements
being made that the bio-retention feature
would destroy the trees. None of the 14 trees were identified
in any previous documents for
removal so the 7 cited for conflict should have been
approved in advance by departmental
variance but in the rush to remove the trees, no variance
was applied for by Mr. Donald
Summers. The trees were gone in a matter of days. It is
troubling that the location of these trees,
being adjacent in proximity to the controversial UDC
pavilion proposal, could have caused a
negative impact on the approval of the proposal by the
UDC. The UDC pavilion proposal would
adversely affect at least 2 other trees scheduled for
planting in the park. Healthy mature trees are
a much more efficient means of storm water displacement
than mechanical bio-retention means
and the city undertook no study to verify that the trees
would be destroyed by the bio-retention
feature. The seven dead trees were removed in days as
well. Former 3 term member of MPAC
and recipient of the 2005 Jesse Reynolds Award for his
conservation work on this park and
others, Charles Woodson disputes the dead tree declaration.
Unfortunately, city arborist
Alexander Elton could provide no records of his decision
on the health of these trees under the
Virginia Freedom of Information Act and contrary to city
policy of marking and allowing an
extended time period for community comment on trees
before removal, the trees were gone in
just days. Mr. Chupek, who is in charge of the Urban
Forestry Division, confirmed that there were
no plans to replace either the removed trees nor the the
ones questionably declared dead and
removed expeditiously by city arborist Alexander Elton.
(ITEM 6)
APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY
After consideration of the facts that trees were removed
without variance to possibly afford
a successful approval of an expedited and very
controversial UDC pavilion proposal in conflict
with the Monroe Park master plan and due to the
appearance that the new councilperson Kim
Gray, who espouses government transparency as a keystone
of her governing philosophy as well
as the new Mayor Levar Stoney would have possibly been
excluded in the expedited UDC review
gives the unmistakable appearance of impropriety in this
matter. When factored in that 3 North
Project Manager Andrea Almond was an applicant on this
expedited UDC pavilion proposal which
denied the affected public and city councilpersons of
open presentation, violating the policy of the
UDC and that Ms. Almond is also a sitting member of the
existing UDC, this appearance of
impropriety is compounded. It is also unmistakable that
contrary to the spirit of Res. 2014-R064-
64 which would diversify the MPC Board of Directors, the
community has been deprived of any
voice pertaining to the city's oldest and most historic
Monroe Park, and that the opposite of
governmental transparency has been promulgated, the Falls
of the James Chapter of the Sierra
Club makes the following remedial suggestions:
1.) The Monroe Park Advisory Council be permanently
reestablished by act of Richmond City
Council and that members of the stake holding
neighborhoods surrounding this park be appointed
by Council as well as representatives of the VCU student
government and VCU Administration to
advise Richmond city government on matters concerning
Monroe Park.
2.) That due to the lack of transparency and due to
questionable decisions made by the MPC in
representing corporate and institutional interests to the
exclusion of the legitimate interests of the
tax payers and other community members, that the lease on
Monroe Park with the MPC be
terminated immediately by ordinance of city council and
that former MPC board members be
rendered ineligible for appointment to the new Monroe
Park Advisory Council.
3.) That the Monroe Park tree canopy, which has been
tragically decimated by the removal of
healthy mature trees, be reforested to the standards
established in the original Monroe Park
master plan, as approved by the UDC in 2008 and is listed
on the city website under planning
documents.
4.) That a policy and funding be established by act of
city council for the replacement of trees that
die or are removed due to disease or acts of God in
Richmond City Parks be replaced in a timely
and appropriate manner.
Thank You,
Scott Burger,
Advocacy Committee of Sierra Club Falls of the James
---------
4 comments:
Thanks for posting.
Anytime - thanks for what you do here in Richmond Scott and being so active.
Thanks for sharing info. Keep up the good work...We hope you will visit our blog often as we discuss topics of interest to you ,
Renovations in Richmond
Post a Comment