Sunday, January 29, 2017

Sierra Club Falls of the James letter to Richmond Mayor and City Council about Monroe Park, Jan. 27, 2017

Have you seen Monroe Park lately? I belong to a Facebook group called "Fans of Monroe Park" and have been following the"renovations" being made to Monroe Park. Among the many changes taken place as part of a $6 million renovation is the removal of many of the trees. Below is a recent letter sent to city officials by the Sierra Club of the Falls of the James. Please read it. Please let your local city council member and the new mayor about your concerns about Monroe Park. And please subscribe to the Fans of Monroe Park on Facebook. 

- Ray.


January 27, 2017

Dear Mayor Stoney, members of City Council,

I am writing to you today representing the Sierra Club Falls of the James, one of the largest and
oldest environmental organizations in the area. We are a local grassroots group that is part of the
national Sierra Club. We are writing because we are very concerned about the removal of trees
and the state of historic Monroe Park. We note that we previously produced a statement on this
topic in May of 2014 (ITEM 1), and we are profoundly disappointed that our concerns have been
ignored. We also note previous public outcry about trees removed at the Redskins Camp,
Tredegar Green, and the Maggie Walker statue site. In regard to Monroe Park, we would like to
present you with the following statement of facts and remedial suggestions. Ideally, we would like
to meet with you in person at a future date to discuss further.


From 2004 until 2012, the Monroe Park Advisory Council (MPAC) was created by Richmond
City Council to craft a master plan for the renovation of Monroe Park, a designated urban green
space purchased by the city in 1851 and historically known for its comprehensive tree canopy
consisting of many mature, healthy and diverse tree specimens. This urban tree canopy provided
great benefit to the urban Richmond community through scenic vistas, cooling shade, storm water
displacement and the filtering of pollutants caused by the dense downtown street grid. In 2008, a
publicly vetted master plan was created and approved by the Richmond Urban Design Committee
(UDC) without comment. This plan emphasized restoration and conservation of the majority of the
existing tree canopy with emphasis placed on species planted during the parks major period of
significance, circa 1900-1910. The original 2008 master plan is available for download on the
Richmond city government website with a graphic depiction of a comprehensive and fully restored
tree canopy (ITEM 1).


In order to implement the approved master plan, work documents had to be crafted. In a
move that was never presented to neighborhood associations or the public at large, the work
documents contained a modification to the tree plan that reduced the number of trees in the park
by +/- 26 trees. Members of the Monroe Park Advisory Council were not advised of the significant
tree canopy reduction as designed by 3 North and supervised by MPAC president Alice Massie.
In 2009, the UDC and the Richmond Planning Commission approved work documents.


In 1991, VCU brought before city council a request to remove 37 trees from Monroe Park
(ITEM 2). Due to public outcry and opposition, city council voted down the measure. Again, in
2006 during master plan deliberations, VCU again made the suggestion that a substantial portion
of the tree canopy be removed. Ms. Massie was in agreement. City planning director Rachel
Flynn in response assisted by hiring consultants and the plan (ITEM 1) was chosen due to public
consensus over the copious removal of healthy mature trees.


In 2011, the Monroe Park Conservancy (MPC), established by Alice Massie and others as a
501c3 corporation, sought to lease Monroe Park to solicit a 3 million dollar amount toward the 6
million dollar park renovation and to exert management preferences on the park thereafter. On
April 14, 2014, city council approved Ord. 2014-010-50, a 30-year lease with the MPC with said
lease commencing after completion of the renovation. On the same day, city council approved
Res. 2014-R064-64 which sought to diversify board membership of the MPC to include
neighboring community stakeholders to be achieved within a 6-month period. Ms. Massie signed
the resolution in agreement on behalf of the MPC. Now, as of 2 1/2 years after the lease
approval, Ms. Massie has refused to diversify the MPC Board as per signed resolution. A month
and a half after lease approval, on May 27, 2014, city council abolished the MPAC through Ord.
2014-111-84. This further excluded any participation by the public on important matters pertaining
to the park.


In December of 2016, during the holiday season and during a time when Richmond City
government was in transition due to election of a new Mayor and a new 2nd District
Councilperson (Monroe Park lies in the 2nd District), a controversial proposal was submitted to
the UDC for an expedited hearing on January 5, 2017 (ITEMS 3 and 4). Both newly elected
Mayor Levar Stoney and 2nd District Councilperson Kim Gray would be eligible to sit on the MPC
Board of Directors as of January 1, 2017 but presumably would not have time to completely vet
the proposal before the hearing on the 5th. The sponsors of this questionable proposal were city
Capital Projects Manager Donald Summers and 3 North Project Manager Andrea Almond, also a
sitting member of the UDC. It is troubling that UDC policy dictates that proposals that have
significant impact such as this one be presented to both affected city council members and
neighborhood associations. No presentations were planned to either city councilors or
neighborhood associations. After complaints on this were made to UDC secretary Ms. Onufer,
Mr. Summers temporarily withdrew the hearing proposal for January 5, 2017.


On December 12,2016, around the time of the UDC proposal application, a meeting was held
in Monroe Park which included Ms. Massie, 3 North Design Team, City Capital Projects Manager
Mr. Donald Summers, city arborist Alexander Elton and people from the city annual tree
contractor service. At this meeting, an additional 14 trees were specified for removal. 7 were
declared dead by the city arborist Alexander Elton and 7 were declared in conflict with a proposed
city bio-retention feature in the park, with statements being made that the bio-retention feature
would destroy the trees. None of the 14 trees were identified in any previous documents for
removal so the 7 cited for conflict should have been approved in advance by departmental
variance but in the rush to remove the trees, no variance was applied for by Mr. Donald
Summers. The trees were gone in a matter of days. It is troubling that the location of these trees,
being adjacent in proximity to the controversial UDC pavilion proposal, could have caused a
negative impact on the approval of the proposal by the UDC. The UDC pavilion proposal would
adversely affect at least 2 other trees scheduled for planting in the park. Healthy mature trees are
a much more efficient means of storm water displacement than mechanical bio-retention means
and the city undertook no study to verify that the trees would be destroyed by the bio-retention
feature. The seven dead trees were removed in days as well. Former 3 term member of MPAC
and recipient of the 2005 Jesse Reynolds Award for his conservation work on this park and
others, Charles Woodson disputes the dead tree declaration. Unfortunately, city arborist
Alexander Elton could provide no records of his decision on the health of these trees under the
Virginia Freedom of Information Act and contrary to city policy of marking and allowing an
extended time period for community comment on trees before removal, the trees were gone in
just days. Mr. Chupek, who is in charge of the Urban Forestry Division, confirmed that there were
no plans to replace either the removed trees nor the the ones questionably declared dead and
removed expeditiously by city arborist Alexander Elton. (ITEM 6)


After consideration of the facts that trees were removed without variance to possibly afford
a successful approval of an expedited and very controversial UDC pavilion proposal in conflict
with the Monroe Park master plan and due to the appearance that the new councilperson Kim
Gray, who espouses government transparency as a keystone of her governing philosophy as well
as the new Mayor Levar Stoney would have possibly been excluded in the expedited UDC review
gives the unmistakable appearance of impropriety in this matter. When factored in that 3 North
Project Manager Andrea Almond was an applicant on this expedited UDC pavilion proposal which
denied the affected public and city councilpersons of open presentation, violating the policy of the
UDC and that Ms. Almond is also a sitting member of the existing UDC, this appearance of
impropriety is compounded. It is also unmistakable that contrary to the spirit of Res. 2014-R064-
64 which would diversify the MPC Board of Directors, the community has been deprived of any
voice pertaining to the city's oldest and most historic Monroe Park, and that the opposite of
governmental transparency has been promulgated, the Falls of the James Chapter of the Sierra
Club makes the following remedial suggestions:

1.) The Monroe Park Advisory Council be permanently reestablished by act of Richmond City
Council and that members of the stake holding neighborhoods surrounding this park be appointed
by Council as well as representatives of the VCU student government and VCU Administration to
advise Richmond city government on matters concerning Monroe Park.
2.) That due to the lack of transparency and due to questionable decisions made by the MPC in
representing corporate and institutional interests to the exclusion of the legitimate interests of the
tax payers and other community members, that the lease on Monroe Park with the MPC be
terminated immediately by ordinance of city council and that former MPC board members be
rendered ineligible for appointment to the new Monroe Park Advisory Council.
3.) That the Monroe Park tree canopy, which has been tragically decimated by the removal of
healthy mature trees, be reforested to the standards established in the original Monroe Park
master plan, as approved by the UDC in 2008 and is listed on the city website under planning
4.) That a policy and funding be established by act of city council for the replacement of trees that
die or are removed due to disease or acts of God in Richmond City Parks be replaced in a timely
and appropriate manner.

Thank You,
Scott Burger,
Advocacy Committee of Sierra Club Falls of the James


Scott Burger said...

Thanks for posting.

Shockoe Examiner Staff - see bottom of blog entry for the specific author. said...

Anytime - thanks for what you do here in Richmond Scott and being so active.

lcrenovation said...

Thanks for sharing info. Keep up the good work...We hope you will visit our blog often as we discuss topics of interest to you ,
Renovations in Richmond